Short comparison of two linux distributions

Slackware

Patrick Volkerding created Slackware, a Linux distribution, in 1993. It was based on the Softlanding Linux System and is the oldest distribution maintained.

Slackware aims to be the most "Unix-like" Linux distribution in terms of design stability and simplicity. It makes as minimal changes as possible to upstream software packages and aims not to anticipate use cases or preclude user decisions.

Slackware, unlike most modern Linux distributions, does not offer automatic dependency resolution of software packages. For setup and management, it relies on plain text files and a small set of shell scripts.

Slackware is available for the IA-32 and x86_64 platforms, including an ARM port.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux was initially created by Daniel Robbins under the name Enoch Linux. Later, the name "Gentoo" was chosen to reflect the possible performance improvements of machine-specific optimization.

The goal of Gentoo Linux was to create a hardware-aware distribution that included only essential programs rather than precompiled binaries. Compared to binary software distributions, the source code is compiled locally based on the user's preferences, but some larger packages, as well as those with no available source code, have precompiled binaries.

The Gentoo package manager, portage, is designed to be modular, portable, user-friendly, customizable and is aimed towards users who want complete control over the applications installed and operating on their computer.

In 2004, Robbins founded the Gentoo Foundation, a non-profit organization. He handed it all of his copyrights and trademarks and stepped down as the project's chief architect. The current board of trustees consists of five people, and a seven-member Gentoo Council oversees Gentoo's technical issues and policies.

Gentoo Linux supports the IA-32, x86-64, IA-64, PA-RISC, 32-bit and 64-bit PowerPC, 64-bit SPARC, DEC Alpha, and ARM architectures.


Kommentaarid

Postita kommentaar

Populaarsed postitused sellest blogist

Online censorship and privacy

Online censorship in Estonia I didn't know this, but Estonia has already been blocking gambling websites that have not been approved by EMTA (Maksu- ja Tolliamet) since 2010, with over 1700 domains now on the list Because of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Estonia has now begun censoring Russian TV channels and websites. I never expected Estonia to do something like this. I oppose the war and believe it should be ended as soon as possible, but I also despise the idea of censorship. This act of censorship, in my opinion, is unacceptable and may mark the beginning of a period in which filtering content that is not supported by the government is acceptable. We could end up like China, where people have no free will and are only permitted to think what the government wants people to think. Mozilla Firefox and privacy Firefox always advertises itself as being privacy-protective, but this is not the case by default. Firefox makes a lot of background connections by default, which reveal
Lisateave

Ten commandments from Netiquette

Kujutis
Know where you are in cyberspace This, in my opinion, is the biggest problem on the internet. The internet is made up of many different people, not just one. Individuals are unaware that there are various communities with various types of people and hobbies. There are places for smart people to act stupid and places for stupid people to act smart. Every single one of such places has their own unwritten rules and joining them takes time. As the saying goes: "Lurk more - it's never enough"     My experience I usually see people on the internet saying that places I visit are terrible because someone called them stupid or whatever. It's very common to call people out when they make mistakes or have opposing opinions here, but it's an issue for visitors from other places. They are accustomed to downvoting posts with which they disagree, resulting in a hivemind of like-minded people. Comments they agree with are displayed above, while those they disagree with are not se
Lisateave

Hackers and hacker culture

People are divided into two categories. Those who are hackers and those who aren't. What the news media did to hacker culture in the 1980s is sad. The majority of journalists and politicians at the time lacked technological knowledge and misinterpreted the term "hacking." As a result, everyone now believes that hacking means breaking into computers. Previously, hacking meant learning systems inside out. It meant knowing where things were and what they did. Now it means breaking into computers with the purpose of compromising devices. The hackers at the time tried to differentiate from such people by calling them "crackers", but as we can see today, it didn't succeed and they are still being called hackers. I love hacker culture. The culture is driven by passion rather than money. People can do whatever they want with their devices. The only limitation is one's own creativity. They also advocate for free speech and decentralization. Unfortunately, their f
Lisateave